


The latest version is not quite as bare-breasted as the original, but it is out of bounds in today's corporate culture view. It is a logo you might expect from a small, indie start-up, like Starbucks was in Seattle 30 years ago. It is absolutely not the logo you would want to walk into a corporate conference room with. We go to a church with a fellowship of thousands. Our pastor is a huge Starbucks fan. Did I say huge? I actually meant HUGE! I really can't imagine Eric walking into church with a coffee cup with a jazzed up mermaid (and not referring to caffeine).
Having worked as a project manager in corporate America for the last 10-15 years, this logo will go over like a brick in today's corporate anti-sexual-harassment culture. There are going to be a bunch of college kids and fringe cultural sects that will think it is the coolest thing ever. But, I would expect to see a huge backlash in coming days or weeks over this. What soccer mom wants to look at naked women on their coffee?
So, my question... Is this a legitimate logo change, an attempt to get back to original company roots? Or, is it a flamboyant and temporary change to get mountains of free press? Everyone who buys coffee on a regular basis is going to take note of this and will be discussing it.
Either way, I don't think this is going to last. If it is an engineered strategy to get everyone to talk about Starbucks, it will be over in a month or so. If it is a sincere change, I believe the resulting cultural clash will result in Starbucks ditching it. Either way, it will end in the same manner, and anyone with a pulse will know about it...
If you don't like illustrated boosoms with your coffee, then come by Nemo's and we'll hook you up with a really cool turtle!



No comments:
Post a Comment